Shadow eval vs A/B testing?
Same spirit, zero user impact: historical queries replay against candidates offline. Promote on measured wins.
Glossary · Shadow Evaluation
Canary deploys for knowledge.
Direct answer
Shadow eval scores candidate knowledge against real historical queries in parallel with live serving (measured, never served) promoting only what beats baseline. UNKNOWN is never treated as zero; absence of evidence stays absence, not failure. It is the final gate between extraction ('this might help') and serving ('this earns tokens every turn'), and the mechanism that lets memory systems learn aggressively without ever regressing answers.
In Anvaya
Questions
Same spirit, zero user impact: historical queries replay against candidates offline. Promote on measured wins.
Anvaya's experience benchmark fixtures: fail→fix headless, denial handling, tool-only exploration, producer-off baselines. The protocol is published; knowledge-regret and injection-precision report UNKNOWN until the shadow harness runs live.
Serving unproven memory taxes every turn's attention. Measure first; attention is the scarcest budget.
25.6 MB median RSS. 25 agents ran in parallel on a Core 2 Duo with 4 GB RAM. Hundreds on your machine. Zero cloud required on the Ollama path.
Requires Rust/cargo to build from source. Linux and macOS today, Windows not yet supported. Pre-1.0, public beta. Pricing TBD.